Quick Links

The Redskins aren't spending enough on player salaries--wait, what?

The Redskins aren't spending enough on player salaries--wait, what?

Stop the presses (or unplug the Internet, or whatever the 2015 equivalent of that expression is). The Redskins are not spending enough cash on player salaries.

According to numbers provided by the NFL Players Association, the Redskins are among 10 NFL teams that are currently spending at a rate that is under the minimum amount of cash that they need to spend on player salaries from 2013-2016. All NFL teams are required to spend at least 89 percent of the cap in cash over that four-year span. After two years, the Redskins have spent 87 percent.

But wait, you say. The Redskins barely scraped by on the cap in each of the last two years. In 2013 they actually ended up in the red due to some bonuses that players earned. Last year they had to restructure a contract late in the year to push a relatively small amount of money into future years to barely get by under the 2014 cap. How can they possibly have spent more money?

The key to understanding this is that the requirement involves cash expenditures, essentially new money. For example, in 2013 and 2014 the Redskins had over $6.9 million in cap charges due to Robert Griffin’s prorated signing bonus. But since the money was paid to Griffin when he signed his contract in 2012, the money does not count towards the cash requirement.

Add in signing bonus charges paid prior to 2013 to players like Trent Williams, Pierre Garçon, Barry Cofield, and others and it adds up to a lot of cap room being consumed by money already paid out and not quite enough left to spend in cash.

The good news here is that this is not a huge issue for the Redskins. The two percent that they are behind in cash spending represents only about $5 million and they have two years to make it up. It should not be difficult.

So the Redskins don’t have to go on a major free agent spending spree or anything in order to make up the shortfall. Some teams like the Raiders, who are $40 million behind the cash spending pace, will be forced to be aggressive.

In fact, the Redskins don’t have to bring in a single free agent. They could invest some signing bonus money in some of their own players like Williams and Ryan Kerrigan and easily get into compliance.

If for some reason the Redskins don’t get up to the cash minimum by the end of 2016 the penalty is not that severe. They would simply have to cut a check for the difference between the requirement and the amount of cash they laid out and hand it over to the NFLPA. The union will distribute it to current and former members of the team.

Quick Links

Need to Know: Is there a surprise coming for the Redskins defensive coordinator job?

Need to Know: Is there a surprise coming for the Redskins defensive coordinator job?

Here is what you need to know on this Sunday, January 22, 95 days before the NFL draft.

Timeline

Days until:
NFL franchise tag deadline 38
NFL free agency starts 46
First Sunday of 2017 season 231

Sunday morning quick hitters

Talk that Greg Manusky is the favorite to get the promotion to Redskins defensive coordinator seems to be based more on deductive reasoning than from any reports from Ashburn. I think he is likely to be the guy but I’m not sure that there won’t be a surprise selection for the job.

The four-year, $42 million contract extension the Rams gave WR Tavon Austin will set the market for DeSean Jackson and Pierre Garçon. Both of their expiring contracts averaged about $8 million per year so they could be in line for healthy raises the year after turning 30. As in other sports, the market is often set by what your dumbest competitior is willing to pay. 

I didn’t give a second thought to leaving DeAngelo Hall off my projection of the defensive roster for the coming season. He said that he would be willing to redo his contract, which calls for him to make $4.25 million this year. That’s fine but I think that the organization will look at the 32 games he missed in the last three seasons combined and decide that they can’t keep a player that they can’t rely on at any price.

How hot is Jay Gruden’s seat in 2017? Assuming he keeps his quarterback, I think that he will be fine with a 10-win season and he will be toast with double-digit losses. The tough call will be if they finish 8-8 or even 9-7 with a playoff miss.

There was a lot of talk about how the Redskins’ salary cap spending on defense last year ($36 million) was dwarfed by what was spent on offense ($78 million). As of right now, the Redskins’ spending is about even, with $57.3 million going to offense and $59.2 million to defense. We’ll see how even the expenditures wind up being when the season starts in September.

Tandler on Twitter

In case you missed it

Stay up to date on the Redskins! Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page www.Facebook.com/RealRedskins and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.

Quick Links

The Final Countdown: Eli Manning goes deep for the Redskins 7th worst play of the year

The Final Countdown: Eli Manning goes deep for the Redskins 7th worst play of the year

As should be expected when a team goes 8-7-1, there were plenty of good moments and a lot of frustrating times during the Redskins’ 2016 season. Over the next couple of weeks, Redskins Insiders Rich Tandler and JP Finlay will take detailed looks at the 10 best plays of 2016 and, to present a more complete picture of the season, the 10 worst.

No. 7 worst play of 2016

Giants at Redskins, Week 17

4:02 left in Q4, Giants ball 1st and 10 at their own 31, game tied 10-10

Eli Manning pass deep left to Tavarres King pushed ob at WAS 25 for 44 yards (Will Blackmon).

Related: The Redskins week that was

Tandler: It looked like the Redskins were on the verge of saving their season. They were down 10-0 in the third quarter but they battled back to tie it up in the late going. But after lulling the Redskins defense to sleep with running plays and short passes, Manning launched one deep down the left sideline. King, who had one reception for six yards on the season coming into the game, had a step on cornerback Greg Toler and he hauled in the pass for 44 yards. Four plays later Robbie Gould kicked a 40-yard field goal to give the Giants the lead.

More Redskins: Offensive coordinator situation set?

Finlay: In a terrible game that led to many more questions than answers for the Redskins, this play was just a huge, huge disappointment. Washington fought back to tie up a game that they had largely been outplayed in, particulrly in the first half. Remember, the Giants had nothing to play for while for the 'Skins, a win would put them in the playoffs. The New York offense was laregly nonexistent in the second half of this game, as it became obvious Eli Manning did not want to get hit. And still, the embattled Redskins defense gave up a long pass play to a dude that had contrbuted basically nothing all season. 

10 best plays countdown

10 worst plays countdown

RELATED: 2017 NFL MOCK DRAFT 1.0

Want more Redskins? Check out @JPFinlayCSN and @Rich_TandlerCSN for live updates or click here for the #RedskinsTalk Podcast on iTunes, here for Google Play or press play below. Don't forget to subscribe!