Quick Links

The Redskins aren't spending enough on player salaries--wait, what?

The Redskins aren't spending enough on player salaries--wait, what?

Stop the presses (or unplug the Internet, or whatever the 2015 equivalent of that expression is). The Redskins are not spending enough cash on player salaries.

According to numbers provided by the NFL Players Association, the Redskins are among 10 NFL teams that are currently spending at a rate that is under the minimum amount of cash that they need to spend on player salaries from 2013-2016. All NFL teams are required to spend at least 89 percent of the cap in cash over that four-year span. After two years, the Redskins have spent 87 percent.

But wait, you say. The Redskins barely scraped by on the cap in each of the last two years. In 2013 they actually ended up in the red due to some bonuses that players earned. Last year they had to restructure a contract late in the year to push a relatively small amount of money into future years to barely get by under the 2014 cap. How can they possibly have spent more money?

The key to understanding this is that the requirement involves cash expenditures, essentially new money. For example, in 2013 and 2014 the Redskins had over $6.9 million in cap charges due to Robert Griffin’s prorated signing bonus. But since the money was paid to Griffin when he signed his contract in 2012, the money does not count towards the cash requirement.

Add in signing bonus charges paid prior to 2013 to players like Trent Williams, Pierre Garçon, Barry Cofield, and others and it adds up to a lot of cap room being consumed by money already paid out and not quite enough left to spend in cash.

The good news here is that this is not a huge issue for the Redskins. The two percent that they are behind in cash spending represents only about $5 million and they have two years to make it up. It should not be difficult.

So the Redskins don’t have to go on a major free agent spending spree or anything in order to make up the shortfall. Some teams like the Raiders, who are $40 million behind the cash spending pace, will be forced to be aggressive.

In fact, the Redskins don’t have to bring in a single free agent. They could invest some signing bonus money in some of their own players like Williams and Ryan Kerrigan and easily get into compliance.

If for some reason the Redskins don’t get up to the cash minimum by the end of 2016 the penalty is not that severe. They would simply have to cut a check for the difference between the requirement and the amount of cash they laid out and hand it over to the NFLPA. The union will distribute it to current and former members of the team.

Quick Links

Dallas sportscaster really doesn't want you comparing the Cowboys' O-line to The Hogs

screen_shot_2017-06-28_at_7.41.56_pm.png
USA TODAY Sports Images

Dallas sportscaster really doesn't want you comparing the Cowboys' O-line to The Hogs

You'd think that comparing an offensive line to The Hogs — that famous unit who played a major role in the Redskins' best days in the 1980s and '90s — would come across as a compliment.

But one Dallas sportscaster didn't take it as such when a CSN reporter tried to do so. 

On Wednesday's edition of Countdown to Training Camp, Newy Scruggs joined Chris Miller and Doc Walker to talk about the Cowboys. During that discussion, Miller asked Scruggs if the team's revered offensive line could end up as the second coming of The Hogs.

Scruggs responded by calling that thought disrespectful. Not disrespectful to The Hogs, however.

"We've already had a great wall in Dallas that won three Super Bowls, OK?" Scruggs said with a tone that was a mix of annoyed and incredulous. "Why can't they be that next version? Let's not compare them to something that's over in Washington."

To see Scruggs' full answer to Miller's question and his entire explanation for why he didn't like it, watch the video above. And for any Redskins fans who don't like the way he spoke about The Hogs, here's the man's Twitter. Now, tweet away.

MORE NFL: TWO STEPS THAT'LL MAKE RYAN KERRIGAN MUCH BETTER

 

Quick Links

Ryan Kerrigan is capable of even more sacks, but he needs help from other defenders

Ryan Kerrigan is capable of even more sacks, but he needs help from other defenders

Here's a list of things you can depend on Ryan Kerrigan doing: having bigger biceps than you, being a part of the world's cutest engagement photos and showing up on Sundays to harrass opposing quarterbacks. 

The Redskins' 2011 first-round pick has never missed an NFL game and has averaged 9.75 sacks over the course of his six-year career. But CSN analyst and former Redskin Doc Walker thinks the 28-year-old can be even better than the production he's posted for Washington.

"He can get that waking up," Walker said, referring to the 11 sacks Kerrigan notched last season. "I need 16, big fella."

But in Walker's opinion, there are two things that are holding the Pro Bowler back from reaching the next level. For his full analysis of what's missing, watch the video above.

MORE REDSKINS: CLINTON PORTIS ONCE CONTEMPLATED MURDER