Quick Links

Stock up-stock down vs. Panthers

morgan_vs.panthers.png

Stock up-stock down vs. Panthers

Here are the players whose stock went up and down against the Panthers.

Up—Josh Morgan caught six passes for 46 yards but that didn’t tell the whole story. A few of his grabs were of the amazing variety, reaching back to snare on pass and catching a couple just before getting smacked by a defender. It has taken him a while but he is finally starting to show the ability that made him one of the team’s top free agent priorities.

Down—Mike Shanahan made it a point last week to say that Aldrick Robinson would see increased playing time. He did, actually starting the game and playing 32 of the 81 offensive snaps. But on the Redskins’ first series he saw a tough but makeable chance slip through his fingers. He was targeted just once more during the game and he caught the pass for six yards.

Up—Hey, it’s not Alfred Morris’ fault that the Redskins only gave him the rock three times in the second half. The rookie continued his roll towards a stellar season with 76 yards on his 13 attempts (5.8 avg.). Play after play he lived up to his motto that he will never let the first defender take him down.

Down—Brandon Banks has not been able to break off a big play in the kicking game and he got a chance to redeem himself with a couple of key third-down touches against the Panthers. He couldn’t find an opening and was tackled short of the sticks both times.

Up—It looks like London Fletcher may be rounding back into form after a couple of off weeks. He had eight tackles and didn’t miss any, per Pro Football Focus. When he plays well, it raises the level of the whole defense.

Down—Ryan Kerrigan had just one assist against the Panthers and that was it. His last sack of a quarterback came in Week 4 against the Bucs; his only other sack was of a wide receiver attempting an option pass against the Steelers.

Quick Links

Need to Know: Why can't the Redskins sign Garcon and Jackson?

Need to Know: Why can't the Redskins sign Garcon and Jackson?

Here is what you need to know on this Wednesday, February 22, 15 days before the March 9 start of NFL free agency.  

Timeline

Days until:

—NFL Franchise tag deadline (3/1) 7
—NFL Combine (3/2) 8
—Redskins offseason workouts start (4/17) 54
—NFL Draft (4/27) 64
—First Sunday of 2017 season (9/10) 200

Why not both Garçon and DJax?

Today's question is from my Facebook page. 

Thanks for the good words, Dennis. There are a few reasons why the Redskins are unlikely to bring back both Pierre Garçon and DeSean Jackson and why it’s possible that neither wide receiver will be back for the 2017 season.

One factor is age. Garçon will be 31 early in training camp and Jackson will turn the same age on December 1. While both are in great shape, investing fairly big money (more on that in a moment) in even one aging receiver is risky. Investing it in two is asking for major cap problems in a year or two.

Both receivers will get substantial contracts. In a market that is thin at the position, each player will get three- or four-year deals worth around $10 million per year. While either one could be cut prior to the end of the deal, the contracts likely will be structured so that if they are released after a year or two the team letting the player go will have to absorb an uncomfortable salary cap hit.

Having that much money tied up in two aging players at one position is dicey in and of itself. But a complicating factor here is Jamison Crowder. He is the team’s future at the position. This year he will complete the third year of his rookie deal making him eligible for a contract extension. If he continues to improve he will want something in that $10 million per year neighborhood. He might not get that much but he’ll get at least $8 million.

So, looking at 2018, if they signed both Garçon and Jackson this year and extend Crowder next season the Redskins would have three receivers taking up close to $30 million in cap space. That is too much. The Redskins were second in the league in spending on WR’s last year with “only” $23.5 million. The organization would be squeezed when it came to paying players at other positions.

I’ll hit on one more thing quickly, since I’m going to write a full post about it soon. Assuming the Redskins tag Kirk Cousins, they suddenly don’t have a whole lot of cap space. Their $64 million available would shrink to around $40 million. That’s still a pretty good chunk of money but they also must get 1-2 defensive linemen and perhaps a safety in free agency, and be prepared to handle possible extensions for Morgan Moses, Spencer Long, Trent Murphy, and Bashaud Breeland.

They could still squeeze one or both receivers in under the cap this year. That would mean some short-term gain for some long-term (as in the next two or three seasons) pain.

Tandler on Twitter

In case you missed it

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerCSN and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.

Quick Links

New #RedskinsTalk Podcast: Is being nice hurting Kirk Cousins?

screen_shot_2017-02-21_at_6.16.29_pm.png
CSN Mid-Atlantic

New #RedskinsTalk Podcast: Is being nice hurting Kirk Cousins?

JP Finlay and Rich Tandler are back for Episode 52 of the #RedskinsTalk Podcast.

With franchise tag day fast approaching, JP and Rich continue to discuss the Kirk Cousins contract situation. Cousins is a positive guy with a great attitude.

But does his happy-go-lucky demeanor actually hurt him at the bargaining table?

Fire up the podcast below. 

RELATED: 2017 NFL MOCK DRAFT 3.0

Want more Redskins? Check out @JPFinlayCSN for live updates or click here for the #RedskinsTalk Podcast on iTuneshere for Google Play or press play below. Don't forget to subscribe!