Washington Redskins

Quick Links

Should the Redskins have been more patient in getting Goldson?

goldson-sideline.png

Should the Redskins have been more patient in getting Goldson?

The Redskins filled a need in trading for free safety Dashon Goldson and that’s certainly a plus for the team. However, the deal cost them a good chunk of their remaining salary cap space, bringing them down from $10 million left to spend to around $6.5 million. Part of that cost perhaps could have been avoided if Scot McCloughan had been a little more patient.

It was pretty well known that the Bucs had no intention of paying Goldson, who will turn 31 in September, the $8 million in salary and workout bonus that he was due in 2015. They were trying to trade him but if they were unable to do so they were going to cut him and eat the $4 million in guaranteed salary that was part of the free agent deal Goldson signed in 2013.

The Redskins came in and gave them something for Goldson even if it was only a swap of late-round 2016 draft picks. The Bucs will pay the $4 million in guaranteed salary so Washington isn’t on the hook for that.

However, Washington is still responsible for the remaining $4 million due Goldson this year. That’s a pretty hefty sum for a player who is coming off of two bad seasons. Last year was particularly awful for Goldson. In 14 games he had no interceptions and defensed just one pass.

Compare what the Redskins are paying Goldson to the one-year, $2 million deal that Tyvon Branch signed with the Chiefs or the one-year, $2.25 million contract Louis Delmas got to stay with the Chiefs. For that matter, Rahim Moore, the second-ranked free agent safety this offseason, got a three-year deal averaging $4 million per year.

On the open market, Goldson would have been offered a deal much closer to what Branch and Delmas got. All the Redskins had to do was wait for the Bucs to cut him.

How long would the Redskins have had to wait? Probably not long. The Bucs’ offseason workout program starts two weeks from Monday. With a $500,000 workout bonus on the line, you can be sure that Goldson would have been at the team facility bright and early. At that point the Bucs would have been taking a big risk. If Goldson had been injured during the voluntary workouts, the team could have been on the hook for his entire 2015 salary. It would have been a dumb risk for the Bucs organization to take considering the low return they got in the trade.

So if the Redskins had waited another two weeks or so it’s likely that Goldson would have been cut. Then they could have negotiated a deal with him that was much closer to his market value and saved themselves at least $2 million in cap space.

It needs to be noted that if Goldson had hit the open market there is no guarantee that the Redskins would have been able to sign him. They might have gone into their own offseason workouts without a legitimate free safety. So knowing that you have Goldson’s services secured is worth something. But is it worth $2 million or more?

Bottom line, it's not a good contract considering what the player has done the last two seasons. And it can't be a good deal for the team if it comes with a bad contract.

Quick Links

A possible trade destination for Redskins RB Matt Jones?

A possible trade destination for Redskins RB Matt Jones?

RICHMOND—The Redskins reportedly have been looking to trade running back Matt Jones since just before the draft. They may be able to find a partner just up I-95.

The Baltimore Ravens are in need of a running back after Kenneth Dixon suffered a season-ending knee injury earlier this week. Terrance West, who gained 774 yards on the ground last year, is healthy and returning but the Ravens want more depth at the position.

That is where Jones could come into play. The 2015 third-round pick of the Redskins was the unquestioned starter going into last season. But fumbling and other issues prompted Jay Gruden to make him inactive the last nine games of the season. Jones further fell out of favor by skipping OTAs this year, a move he made on the advice of his now-former agent.

RELATED: Is Cousins overrated?

Ravens coach Jim Harbaugh said last year that he liked Jones “a lot” in the 2015 draft and he could well still be intrigued by his size and speed. ESPN Ravens reporter Jamison Hensley said that Jones could be a good fit for the Ravens in their current situation.

It should be noted that Hensley seems to be engaging in informed speculation and not relaying anything he heard from the team’s decision makers. He also speaks of the possibility of Baltimore picking up Jones after the Redskins release him.

But there could be some incentive for the Ravens to talk trade with the Redskins rather than waiting for Jones to hit the waiver wire. For one thing, getting their new back in sooner rather than later would benefit the Ravens, allowing the player to get acclimated to his new quarterback and offensive line. While the Redskins are inevitably going to cut Jones, they have no incentive to do so before the final cuts just before the start of the season. Perhaps the Ravens will want to give up some minor compensation, something like a swap of sixth- and seventh-round picks, to get Jones in for the start of training camp.

MORE REDSKINS: Ranking the Redskins roster, the final update

Hensley also mentions the possibility that the Ravens will look at former Redskin Alfred Morris for depth at running back. He currently is buried on the Cowboys’ depth chart behind All-Pro Ezekiel Elliott and Darren McFadden. However, there is the possibility of a domestic-violence suspension on the horizon for Elliott. While the suspension is likely to be brief the Cowboys probably don’t want to depart with any running back depth until the matter has been settled.

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerCSN and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.

Quick Links

Ranking the 2017 Redskins roster, the final update: 1-10

Ranking the 2017 Redskins roster, the final update: 1-10

At CSNmidatlantic.com we projected the Redskins’ 53-man roster (offense, defense) right after minicamp. Now we are taking it one step further and ranking the 53 players we think will make the team.

The rankings are determined by who we think will have the most impact on the 2017 Redskins. No consideration was given for past performance or for what a particular player might do down the road. We’ll be revealing the rankings over the next few weeks.

Today we’re updating the list with the players we ranked from 1-10. Here are some of the players in our latest update:

—A 2016 free agent who needs to make more big plays.

—A rookie expected to bolster one of the weakest units on the team.   

—Each of the five highest-paid players on the team.

—What you won’t find: Any players who will be over the age of 29 in Week 1.     

Go here to see our ranking of the 2017 Redskins, players 1-53.

Stay up to date on the Redskins! Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerCSN and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.