Quick Links

NTK: Fan questions—When will Redskins TE Jordan Reed get a new contract?

NTK: Fan questions—When will Redskins TE Jordan Reed get a new contract?

Here is what you need to know on this Sunday, March 13, 46 days before the NFL Draft.

Fan questions--What will the Redskins do at safety?

The interest in Bengals S Nelson does not appear to be too serious at this point but we don’t really know. Redskins Park is no longer a broadcast center when it comes to free agent information. That’s good in the overall scheme of things but not necessarily good for keep up with the news on a minute to minute basis. Back to Nelson, this doesn't mean that things won't advance further but there doesn't appear to be much working right now. Weddle will prove to be too expensive for the Redskins. I’ve heard that he has narrowed his choice down to a few teams and the Redskins aren’t one of them.

I think you can probably look at the timing of the Ryan Kerrigan and Trent Williams extensions last year to figure out when prime time for taking care of such business is. Kerrigan signed in late July, just before training camp started. The news of Williams’ extension came just before the third preseason game in late August. So I’d look for similar timing with Reed. There is no guarantee that anything will get done but that should be the time frame if it does. The big thing to watch will be Cousins’ extension. If they free up some cap space by getting that done the chances of getting Reed done could increase.

The Redskins have needs at both positions but it’s hard to say that one is a “priority” over another. If they are on the clock and there is a choice of a safety or a D-lineman there they’ll take the best available player. If they’re equal or very close to it, they would probably take the safety. But it wouldn’t necessarily be because it’s a greater need but because there are many fewer quality safeties in this draft (and in most recent drafts) so the safety would be the most valuable pick. The point here is that the way the draft goes, who is on the board when you pick, determines your “priorities”.

I think the chances of them taking a running back in Round 1 are very slim. That’s not because I think that Scot McCloughan is philosophically opposed but because I think that Ezekiel Elliott is the only back that warrants first-round consideration and I think he’ll be gone. But I think that any time after that there could be a back on the board that McCloughan can’t pass up.

Timeline

—The Redskins last played a game 63 days ago. It will be about 182 days until they play another one.

Days until: Redskins offseason workouts start 36; 2016 NFL draft 46; Redskins training camp starts 137

In case you missed it

Quick Links

Clinton Portis confesses that bankruptcy pushed him to the brink of murder

Clinton Portis confesses that bankruptcy pushed him to the brink of murder

While starring for the Redskins from 2004-2010, Clinton Portis was a beloved player renowned for his toughness on the field and humor off of it.

But a Sports Illustrated story published Wednesday shows how different the post-football Portis was from the one who made a name for himself in the Burgundy and Gold.

After retiring from the NFL, Portis ran into severe money trouble when he trusted his money with people he wishes he hadn't, according to SI's Brian Burnsed. The running back filed for bankruptcy in 2015, and the financial issues he encountered pushed him to the brink of committing a serious crime.

MORE: ONE STAT WHERE ROB KELLEY IS SUPERIOR TO EZEKIEL ELLIOTT

"On a handful of late nights and early mornings in 2013 he lurked in his car near a Washington, D.C.–area office building, pistol at his side, and waited for one of several men who had managed a large chunk of the $43.1 million he earned with his 2,230 carries over nine NFL seasons," Burnsed writes.

“It wasn’t no beat up,” Portis told the writer. “It was kill.”

He never did follow through on the revenge he wanted, thanks in large part to a friend and therapist who forced him to consider how killing someone would affect his family and all he had worked for in his life. If he had found the person he was targeting, however, he's honest about what would've happened.

“We’d probably be doing this interview from prison,” Portis, who stopped participating in the story after two interviews, said.

Another notable part from the story is that the 35-year-old is experiencing memory lapses and often gets lost while driving, but is afraid to be tested because he's "really scared" of what those tests would find. Overall, though, Portis is in a better place now than he was a few years ago.

"Life is so much clearer after coming out of that storm," he said.

RELATED: BRUCE ALLEN DOESN'T HAVE THE STRONGEST OF TRACK RECORDS WITH QBS

Quick Links

True or false: The Redskins will carry four tight ends on the roster

True or false: The Redskins will carry four tight ends on the roster

True or false: The Redskins will carry four tight ends on their roster this year.

Rich Tandler: True

The Redskins added a tight end to a roster that had four experienced players at the position already on it. But, make no mistake, fifth-round selection Jeremy Sprinkle was not a “luxury” pick.

Jordan Reed and Vernon Davis are both stone cold locks to make the roster. They are the pass catchers who are expected to combine for perhaps 1,500 yards and at least a dozen touchdowns.

The third tight end could be Niles Paul, a veteran who has battled injuries the last two years. He appears to be healthy and if he stays that way he can play tight end, be the fullback on the six or eight snaps per game the Redskins use one, and be a strong contributor on special teams.

MORE REDSKINS: TRESS WAY HIT A BYSTANDER WHILE GOLFING, BUT GRUDEN ISN'T SURPRISED

Sprinkle can fill a role that those three can’t—blocking tight end. Jay Gruden had to put tackle Ty Nsekhe on the field when they needed a three-tight end set. That made the job of the defense easier with essentially four eligible receivers to deal with.

With a well-defined role for each player, it would make perfect sense for the Redskins to carry four tight ends on the 53-man roster rather than the customary three. Of course, if they carry four at tight end they have to go with one fewer player elsewhere. They will find a spot.

Running back seems to be the logical place to go for that spot. If they keep, say, Mack Brown as the fourth running back, you then have a player without a defined role. He’s the backup to the backup to the backup. Sure, he can do special teams, but not as well as Paul.

Perhaps if you want to keep Brown you let go of Paul with his recent injury history and his $2.2 million cap number in mind. Or you can let Sprinkle get some seasoning on the practice squad.

But I think that the Redskins drafted Sprinkle with the plan to keep four tight ends. If they are going to go with their best, most versatile 53 that is what they will do.

JP Finlay: False

Man, this is tough. If you asked me this in May, I thought Niles Paul would be caught in a roster crunch. After watching the guys on the field through OTAs and minicamp, this decision becomes much harder. 

Paul played well in those sessions, showed no rust from the injuries and impressed regardless what quarterback he was paired up with. Sprinkle looked like a rookie with a lot to learn, and while he's really big, he still seemed like his upper body could fill out in the NFL. 

In a vacuum it's easy to say the Redskins should keep four tight ends. Like Tandler laid out above, Reed and Davis are roster locks. Paul can help in a ton of spots, and Sprinkle should evolve into the blocking tight end for the jumbo set. 

But NFL rosters aren't made in vacuums. To keep a fourth tight end, the Redskins will have to make a cut, and Tandler suggested Mack Brown could be the guy. I don't see that happening. Jay Gruden and Randy Jordan speak glowingly about Brown. 

This will be a fun roster spot to watch, but in June, before any injuries or the competition of training camp, I think the Redskins keep Reed, Davis and Paul. Then they really, really hope they can sneak the rookie Sprinkle to their practice squad.

Washington has not kept three healthy tight ends on their roster in the last few seasons, and if that trend continues, Sprinkle would make the NFL roster before the end of the year. Keeping four tight ends just isn't a luxury the Redskins have, especially keeping three quarterbacks like they're expected to do. 

Tandler-Finlay True or False series: Leading rusher | Leading receiver