Washington Redskins

Quick Links

NFL replay under review: Teams to vote on 24 rule changes at upcoming meetings

nfl-replay-review.png

NFL replay under review: Teams to vote on 24 rule changes at upcoming meetings

The NFL owners, head coaches, and other executives are getting together in Arizona for their annual meetings. The focus is frequently on rule changes, tweaks to the way the game is played on the field and how it is administered. Here are the 24 proposed changes (via NFL.com) with some comments were warranted.

A vote of 75 percent of the owners (24) is needed to pass any rule changes.

Of the proposed modifications, 13 would affect the instant replay review process:

  • Allow coaches with available timeouts and challenges to challenge any official’s decision except scoring plays and turnovers. Comment: Why not? If a coach believes there is indisputable visual evidence that the officials got any call (or non-call) wrong he should be able to throw the challenge flag. If they burn their challenges early, so be it.
  • Subject every foul that is called to instant replay review.
  • Give teams three challenges, eliminating the need for a team be successful on each of its first two challenges to be awarded a third. Comment: This one was proposed by the Redskins. Why, so Jay Gruden can have even more fruitless challenges? He had one successful challenge in eight tries in 2014.
  • Use instant replay to review personal foul calls.
  • Review any penalty that results in an automatic first down.
  • From Tennessee and Indianapolis: Use instant replay on fouls against defenseless players. Tennessee proposes that fouls for hits on defenseless receivers can be created in replay when a completed pass is reversed to  incomplete . Indianapolis proposed that coaches be allowed to challenge fouls against defenseless players without losing a timeout on an unsuccessful challenge. Comment: Perhaps something needs to be done here. It’s such a tough call for the officials to make at full speed. We often see a player get flagged on a Sunday and then not fined during the following week, an indication that replay review found no violation.
  • Let replay officials initiate reviews of plays that would result in a score or change of possession if the on-field ruling is reversed.
  • Allow replay to be used to resolve clock issues. Tennessee wants review to apply to the status of the game clock on the final play of either half or overtime; its proposal would be in effect for only one year. Chicago wants replay to apply to the status of the play clock.
  • Place fixed cameras on all of the field’s boundary lines. Comment: The NFL couldn’t afford that! Oh, wait, they could. Easily. Make it happen.
  • Let stadium-produced video be used for instant replay review.

Two proposals would affect the PAT process:

  • From Indianapolis: Reward teams that score a touchdown and successfully convert a two-point conversion with an opportunity to attempt a 50-yard field goal for an additional point (creating a chance for 9 total points: 6+2+1). Comment: Un, no.
  • Move the line of scrimmage for PAT kicks to the 15-yard line. Comment: I’d go with the 25 but anything that makes the PAT a little more difficult is fine with me.

Other proposals:

  • Allow both teams to have at least one offensive possession in overtime, even if the team possessing the ball first scores a touchdown. Comment: Hey, how about this—play some defense in overtime. Or, better yet, win the game in the 60 minutes that precede overtime. From here it’s not too far down the slippery slope to giving out participation trophies.
  • Prohibit defensive players on punts from pushing teammates into the offensive formation at the line of scrimmage.
  • Allow any offensive player to be called for an illegal “peel-back” block when the blocker goes below the waist toward his own goal line.

Which rule changes do you support? Let us know in the comments!

Quick Links

A possible trade destination for Redskins RB Matt Jones?

A possible trade destination for Redskins RB Matt Jones?

RICHMOND—The Redskins reportedly have been looking to trade running back Matt Jones since just before the draft. They may be able to find a partner just up I-95.

The Baltimore Ravens are in need of a running back after Kenneth Dixon suffered a season-ending knee injury earlier this week. Terrance West, who gained 774 yards on the ground last year, is healthy and returning but the Ravens want more depth at the position.

That is where Jones could come into play. The 2015 third-round pick of the Redskins was the unquestioned starter going into last season. But fumbling and other issues prompted Jay Gruden to make him inactive the last nine games of the season. Jones further fell out of favor by skipping OTAs this year, a move he made on the advice of his now-former agent.

RELATED: Is Cousins overrated?

Ravens coach Jim Harbaugh said last year that he liked Jones “a lot” in the 2015 draft and he could well still be intrigued by his size and speed. ESPN Ravens reporter Jamison Hensley said that Jones could be a good fit for the Ravens in their current situation.

It should be noted that Hensley seems to be engaging in informed speculation and not relaying anything he heard from the team’s decision makers. He also speaks of the possibility of Baltimore picking up Jones after the Redskins release him.

But there could be some incentive for the Ravens to talk trade with the Redskins rather than waiting for Jones to hit the waiver wire. For one thing, getting their new back in sooner rather than later would benefit the Ravens, allowing the player to get acclimated to his new quarterback and offensive line. While the Redskins are inevitably going to cut Jones, they have no incentive to do so before the final cuts just before the start of the season. Perhaps the Ravens will want to give up some minor compensation, something like a swap of sixth- and seventh-round picks, to get Jones in for the start of training camp.

MORE REDSKINS: Ranking the Redskins roster, the final update

Hensley also mentions the possibility that the Ravens will look at former Redskin Alfred Morris for depth at running back. He currently is buried on the Cowboys’ depth chart behind All-Pro Ezekiel Elliott and Darren McFadden. However, there is the possibility of a domestic-violence suspension on the horizon for Elliott. While the suspension is likely to be brief the Cowboys probably don’t want to depart with any running back depth until the matter has been settled.

Stay up to date on the Redskins. Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerCSN and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.

Quick Links

Ranking the 2017 Redskins roster, the final update: 1-10

Ranking the 2017 Redskins roster, the final update: 1-10

At CSNmidatlantic.com we projected the Redskins’ 53-man roster (offense, defense) right after minicamp. Now we are taking it one step further and ranking the 53 players we think will make the team.

The rankings are determined by who we think will have the most impact on the 2017 Redskins. No consideration was given for past performance or for what a particular player might do down the road. We’ll be revealing the rankings over the next few weeks.

Today we’re updating the list with the players we ranked from 1-10. Here are some of the players in our latest update:

—A 2016 free agent who needs to make more big plays.

—A rookie expected to bolster one of the weakest units on the team.   

—Each of the five highest-paid players on the team.

—What you won’t find: Any players who will be over the age of 29 in Week 1.     

Go here to see our ranking of the 2017 Redskins, players 1-53.

Stay up to date on the Redskins! Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerCSN and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.