Quick Links

Need to Know: Will the Redskins use the franchise tag?

Need to Know: Will the Redskins use the franchise tag?

Here is what you need to know on this Saturday, February 14, four days before the Washington Redskins and the rest of the NFL assemble in Indianapolis for the NFL Combine.

Question of the day

We’re changing up the format of Need to Know for the offseason. Every day I’ll give an in-depth answer to a question submitted by a fan on my Twitter feed, via the Real Redskins Facebook page, or in the comments section here. On Twitter address the questions to me at @Rich_TandlerCSN with the #NTK hashtag. There will be a comment thread set up on the Facebook page and if you’re asking your question here, put “for NTK” at the start of the comment.

We’re going to do something a little different today. If it works, I might do it every Saturday. Every week I get some good questions that just don’t demand a big enough answer to fill up a whole post. This morning I’m going to clean out my inbox, in a manner of speaking, and rapid-fire answer some questions that require shorter answers.

Here we go.

I see virtually no chance of that happening. It would cost $13.75 million to tag Brian Orakpo and that is not happening. Are they going to pay Niles Paul, Roy Helu, or Jarvis Jenkins the average of the top five highest-paid players at their positions and guarantee that money the moment they sign their deals? No. Teams can tag players starting Monday but don't look for the Redskins to do it.

If you release a player prior to June 1, all of the prorated signing bonus that is left on his contract will be charged to that season's salary cap. If you cut him after June 1, the remaining money is split between the current season and the following season. So you lessen the cap impact of the move in the current season but you pay off the balance the following year.

https://twitter.com/skinz4life1975/status/557966213805252608

At this point, it's very tough to name names. I did venture at one possibility here yesterday when I looked at Utah CB Eric Rowe. Whether or not it's Rowe, a cornerback to develop is a good possibility since there are only a few that have the size that Scot McCloughan likes in the earlier rounds. I'd say look for a wide receiver (a tall one like Tony Lippett of Michigan state) and an offensive lineman (a heavy one like Rob Havenstein of Wisconsin). I'll be at the NFL Combine next week, follow along here, on my Twitter account (@Rich_TandlerCSN), the Real Redskins Facebook page, and my Instagram account (RichTandler).

It's no secret that McCloughan prefers bigger football players just about everywhere, including at wide receiver. Jackson, who is listed at 5-10 but probably not that tall, probably would not have been drafted by McCloughan or signed by him as a free agent. But that doesn't mean that Jackson is going to get run out of town immediately. McCloughan knows that he can't build the team the way he wants to in one offseason. It's like that Jackson will at least play out his contract, which has two years left to run.

Timeline

—It’s been 48 days since the Redskins played a game. It will be about 211 days until they play another one.

Days until: NFL free agency starts 24; Redskins offseason workouts start 65; 2015 NFL Draft 75

If you have any questions about what's going on at Redskins Park, hit me up in the comments. And I'm always on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.

Like Real Redskins on Facebook!

Follow Real Redskins on Instagram @RichTandler

In case you missed it

Quick Links

New #RedskinsTalk Podcast: JP & Tandler break down Redskins draft targets, and players to avoid

screen_shot_2017-04-25_at_1.46.17_pm.png

New #RedskinsTalk Podcast: JP & Tandler break down Redskins draft targets, and players to avoid

How plausible is a draft day trade? Could the Redskins move up? And what to do about all those 'diluted samples'? JP Finlay and Rich Tandler break it all down.

<<<LOOKING AT REDSKINS DRAFT PROSPECTS>>>

Want more Redskins? Check out @JPFinlayCSN for live updates or click here for the #RedskinsTalk Podcast on iTunes, here for Google Play or press play below. Don't forget to subscribe!

Quick Links

Redskins roster by the numbers: Defense

Redskins roster by the numbers: Defense

The Redskins currently have 75 players on their roster. They are about to add some more in the draft and as undrafted free agents. They can have up to 90 players on their offseason roster. Year after year the distribution of those players to positions are consistent. We can look at what they have and see what they need to sign to get through OTAs, minicamp, and training camp.

Let’s break down the numbers by position and see where they will need to add players to get to where they want to be going into training camp. Last week we looked at the offense; today we’ll look at the numbers on defense.

End

Have: 6
Need: 8

Just like in a game, you want plenty of players to rotate through the line in the heat of training camp. They could carry one or two additional players here since they are legitimately in search of players who can have an impact beyond starters Terrelle McClain and Stacy McGee and pass rushing project Anthony Lanier.  

Nose Tackle

Have: 2
Need: 4

Like with the ends, you want to have a few big guys to rotate in when it gets hot in Richmond. It would be surprising if the Redskins didn’t add a nose tackle to the mix in the draft, probably on Saturday.

Inside linebacker

Have: 9
Need: 8

If the Redskins take an inside linebacker in the draft, as many expect that will, this position would get very crowded. They could keep as many as six on the final 53-man roster if there are a couple of key special teams players in the group.

RELATED: NFL Mock Draft Version 10.0

Outside linebacker

Have: 7
Need: 7

They could keep an extra one or two if they find some in the draft. You can’t have too many pass rushers, although they have kept just four on the final roster recently.  

Cornerback

Have: 7
Need: 8

It has always seemed to be a little odd to me that they’ll bring in a dozen wide receivers and only seven or eight corners.

MORE REDSKINS: Redskins mock 2.0 goes offense early, defense often

Safety

Have: 7
Need: 7

The depth chart here is unusual in that all seven players have significant NFL playing time; there is no “training camp fodder” here. If the draft one, an experienced player might be let go.  

Total defensive players under contract: 38
Total needed for camp: 41

There are 34 offensive players and three specialists on the roster, making the total 75. If they don’t make deals and use all 10 of their draft picks that will leave just five spots to sign undrafted free agents. They likely will want to sign more than that meaning that some of the players currently on the roster will end up getting cut, particularly those on the defensive side.

Stay up to date on the Redskins! Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerCSN and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.