Quick Links

Need to Know: Why did the Redskins stick with the 3-4 defense?

joe-barry-preston-smith.png

Need to Know: Why did the Redskins stick with the 3-4 defense?

Here is what you need to know on this Saturday, June 6, 10 days before the Washington Redskins start minicamp.

Question of the day

A few days a week I’ll give an in-depth answer to a question submitted by a fan on my Twitter feed, via the Real Redskins Facebook page, or in the comments section here. On Twitter address the questions to me at @Rich_TandlerCSN with the #NTK hashtag. There will be a comment thread set up on the Facebook page and if you’re asking your question here, put “for NTK” at the start of the comment.

I’ll also take your questions via email. Hit me up rich.tandler+csn@gmail.com with “NTK” in the subject line. Just keep them relatively brief, please. 

During the course of the week I get some good questions that don’t quite need a full post to answer. So on the weekend I like to empty out the inbox and go through and answer some rapid fire style. The first two questions are from the Real Redskins Facebook page.

I think the better question is, at this point, why change? They already had the personnel for a 3-4 except for the nose tackle and they added a good one in Terrance Knighton. I know that fans are somehow convinced that the 4-3 is, by its very nature, a superior defense. But the facts just don’t back that up. A total of 17 teams are expected to use the 3-4 as their base alignment. Some of those defenses will be good, some will not. But it will be due to the personnel they have and not how they typically line up. If the early looks at OTAs are any indication, however, the Redskins will line up in multiple fronts this year so they will be plenty of chances for the fans to see their beloved four-man fronts.

You can look at this question one of two ways. I think that it will be very tough for any player to make the 53-man roster at quarterback. But I wouldn’t call the position “overloaded” because there are question marks about all three of the players on the depth chart. In fact, I don’t think that any of the positions on the Redskins are overloaded in the true sense of the word. But I do think that, say, an undrafted free agent would find it tough to break through at wide receiver, quarterback, or running back. I think a player could surprise just about anywhere else.

This is asked of Jay Gruden on occasion and the answer he generally gives is that being a dropback passer has to be part of the skill set of a successful NFL quarterback. There are times when you have to drop back time after time and nothing else a quarterback does can compensate for not being able to do that. That’s accurate and I’ll add that nothing really “fit” Griffin last year. He didn’t run particularly well, he didn’t make plays on the move, and the read option was a dud. So perhaps part of the problem is finding that “fit”. Griffin might not be a drop back passer but just like Tom Brady needs to run sometime, performing from the pocket is something that Griffin has to be able to do. Everything else, the mobile QB stuff, can build off of that.

I’ve looked at Morris’ future a few times here and the answer has always that it’s too soon to tell. Gruden speaks highly of Morris and always makes sure to mention that Morris is going to be the No. 1 back. But that doesn’t address the long-term future of Morris as a Redskin. My take on it right now is that it is unusual spend a third-round pick on a running back and give the one you have a big free agent contract if the new guy shows anything. That’s just right now, though. Again, it’s early and a lot will happen between now and when free agency opens up next March.

Timeline

—It’s been 160 days since the Redskins played a game. It will be 99 days until they play the Dolphins at FedEx Field.

Days until: Redskins minicamp starts 10; Redskins training camp starts 54; Thursday night Redskins @ Giants 110

If you have any questions about what's going on at Redskins Park, hit me up in the comments. And I'm always on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.

Like Real Redskins on Facebook!

Follow Real Redskins on Instagram @RichTandler

In case you missed it

Quick Links

Need to Know: Did the Redskins underachieve in 2016?

Need to Know: Did the Redskins underachieve in 2016?

Here is what you need to know on this Wednesday, January 18, 99 days before the NFL draft.

Timeline

Days until:
NFL franchise tag deadline 43
NFL free agency starts 51
First Sunday of 2017 season 236

The coordinator search and more

Did the Redskins underachieve this year? I know that a metric like Football Outsiders' DVOA is not the final word in the quality of a team but looking at it year after year it usually does work out that the teams with the better numbers in DVOA usually win more games than those with worse numbers. The Redskins finished 2016 eighth in DVOA. Considering that 12 teams make the playoffs, that could be considered a playoff quality team. Yet 15 teams finished with a better record than they did. I’m sure there are some holes in the formula for the stat but just looking at that it sure appears that the Redskins did leave some wins out on the field.

John Keim is reporting that the Redskins are prepared to switch to a 4-3 defense if that is what their new defensive coordinator prefers. They have been in the 3-4 since Mike Shanahan arrived in 2010. Whether it is because of the scheme or lack of draft and free agent resources spent on the line and at safety, the defense hasn’t been very good. As Keim notes, they will need to make some personnel changes if they do change but with a full load of draft picks and $62 million in cap space this may be the time to do it.

I expected the angst that was all over Twitter when word of the Rob Ryan interview got out. But it’s pretty dumb to get all worked up over an interview (with all due respect to readers here who may have been upset). It’s not a hiring. Look, somehow or another Ryan managed to stay employed as an NFL defensive coordinator for 12 straight seasons. I don’t know how to research it without going through some very time consuming and tedious steps but I’d be willing to bet that only about a few dozen men in the history of the league have been able to remain a defensive coordinator for that many season in a row. The organization can learn something from sitting down and talking to him for a few hours.

I understand that we want things to talk about in a relatively slow time. But I just don’t see why there is fear out there over the possibility that Kyle Shanahan will get hired as the coach of the 49ers and somehow steal Kirk Cousins away to be his quarterback. The Redskins can maintain his rights via the franchise tag. They could tag Cousins and trade him to the 49ers but there would be a heavy price in terms of draft picks. But while it’s possible, it’s unlikely. The chances are very, very good that Cousins will be in a Redskins uniform this year via either the tag or a long-term deal. 

Tandler on Twitter

In case you missed it

Stay up to date on the Redskins! Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page www.Facebook.com/RealRedskins and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.

Quick Links

#RedskinsTalk Podcast Episode 40 - Seriously, when will the Redskins pick a coordinator?

#RedskinsTalk Podcast Episode 40 - Seriously, when will the Redskins pick a coordinator?

As the Redskins settle into the offseason without both an offensive and defensive coordinator, JP Finlay and Rich Tandler debate who will get the jobs, and when they will be announced. 

RELATED: 2017 NFL MOCK DRAFT 1.0: CORNERING THE MARKET