Here is what you need to know on this Friday, January 1, two days before the Washington Redskins travel to Dallas to play the Cowboys.
Happy New Year!
Who will the Redskins play next?
Normally on Fridays here I discuss five players who need to step up for the Redskins to beat the upcoming opponent. But we really don’t know who will be playing for them on Sunday since some players will be held out and others could be ticketed for an early exit.
So let’s get out the $100 in imaginary poker chips and spread them out over the Redskins’ three potential playoff opponents and see what I think the chances are of each of them showing up at FedEx Field on the weekend of January 9-10 are.
Seattle (must beat the Cardinals and have to Vikings lose the Packers to be the No. 5 seed) —$20 I think that the unanimous opinion of fans and media is that the Seahawks are the worst matchup for the Redskins so them being the least likely opponent seems to be a positive development. I think the Cardinals will take care of business at home and push the Seahawks to the six seed.
Packers (must lose to Vikings)—$30 Don’t look now but the Packers aren’t exactly a powerhouse. They have gone 4-5 since their 6-0 start and Aaron Rodgers has been sacked 41 times. I think it’s very possible for the Vikings to go in there and beat them.
Vikings (must lose to Packers and have Cardinals beat the Seahawks)—$50 The Seahawks are seven-point underdogs to the Cardinals and the Packers are favored by three. I’m not exactly sure how those odds work out mathematically but I’d say that the chances of two home favorites winning are right around 50 percent. So that is where I’ll put half of my poker chips.
—Today’s schedule: Practice 11:55; Jay Gruden and Sean McVan news conferences and player availability after practice, approx. 1:15
—Days until: Redskins @Cowboys 2; start of NFL playoffs 8
In case you missed it
At CSNmidatlantic.com we projected the Redskins’ 53-man roster (offense, defense) right after minicamp. Now we are taking it one step further and ranking the 53 players we think will make the team.
The rankings are determined by who we think will have the most impact on the 2017 Redskins. No consideration was given for past performance or for what a particular player might do down the road. We’ll be revealing the rankings over the next few weeks.
Today we’re updating the list with the players we ranked from 1-10. Here are some of the players in our latest update:
—A 2016 free agent who needs to make more big plays.
—A rookie expected to bolster one of the weakest units on the team.
—Each of the five highest-paid players on the team.
—What you won’t find: Any players who will be over the age of 29 in Week 1.
Go here to see our ranking of the 2017 Redskins, players 1-53.
Stay up to date on the Redskins! Rich Tandler covers the team 365 days a year. Like his Facebook page Facebook.com/TandlerCSN and follow him on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN.
Things were not dull in Washington this offseason. The team fired general manager Scot McCloughan and failed to reach a long-term contract with quarterback Kirk Cousins. Again.
Of all the things that happened this offseason, what will make the biggest impact on the field? The results might not correspond to what created the biggest buzz. Going in reverse order, here's what will matter most to the Redskins this season.
ROSTER BATTLES: Left guard | Tight end | Nickel cornerback | Inside linebacker | Running back
- No. 4 - The Redskins again could not reach a long-term deal with Kirk Cousins, but like in 2016, the quarterback won't allow that to impact his performance on the field. Bruce Allen's public statement about contract talks didn't help matters, but Cousins has possibly one hundred million reasons to stay focused on the field.
- No. 3 - Losing Sean McVay was a blow for this team that isn't being properly talked about. McVay's absence will absolutely have more impact on the 2017 season than Cousins' contract situation. An accelerated offensive mind adept at engaging players and running meetings, McVay will be missed.
- No. 2 - The Redskins handled the firing of Scot McCloughan about as well as a toddler handles applesauce. It was a mess. The team deserves to be admonished for how things shook out. That said, on the field in 2017, the Redskins won't really feel the affects. The team is in place, including many players of McCloughan's choosing. Some organizational, cultural loss could occur, but that is likely to be felt in the years to come.
- No. 1 - The biggest thing that will impact the Redskins on the field in 2017? Losing two of their best players from on the field in 2016. For all of the controversy that surrounded McCloughan's ouster and not getting a deal done with Cousins, not having Pierre Garçon and DeSean Jackson will by far cause the most shockwaves for Jay Gruden's team. Terrelle Pryor and Josh Doctson might, even should, offset much of the loss, but until the proof is on the field this will remain the biggest offseason question in Washington. Jackson and Garçon accounted for more than 40 percent of Cousins' 2016 passing yards. That's a giant hole.
<<<NFL POWER RANKINGS: WHO GOT BETTER AFTER THE DRAFT>>>
Want more Redskins? Click here to follow JP on Facebook and check out @JPFinlayCSN for live updates via Twitter! Click here for the #RedskinsTalk on Apple Podcasts, here for Google Play or press play below. Don't forget to subscribe!