Bruce Allen filled in for the vacationing Peter King and wrote todays Monday Morning Quarterback column for SportsIllustrated.com. As is usually the case when he talks to members of the media he didnt break any news but he did have an interesting story or two to tell.He tells the story of riding in the back seat of a car in 1964. In the front seat were his father George Allen, then the Chicago defensive coordinator, and legendary Bears coach George Halas. Halas turned around and said that he was going to teach the younger Allen, who was not yet 10 years old, his first cuss word."You can only use this word on a really bad person, someone you really hate or who did something very very bad." He then made me acknowledge that I understood, to which I responded: "Yes, Coach!" After what seemed like the longest minute ever, he turned around and said one word with an intensity that I had never seen: "PACKER." And then he added: "Don't tell your mom I told you!"One could see George Allen doing the same thing several years later with a kid in the back of his car with COWBOY substituted for Packer.Allen does take a few stands on issues, saying that he would be in favor of taking the names off of the back of players jerseys and among the five things he looks forward to is the NFL returning to Los Angeles.There appears to be a typo in one of the rule changes he would advocate making. In the article is says to Move the kickoffs back to the 40-yard line. All of this talk about eliminating the kickoff is nonsense.Kickoffs were moved from the 30- to the 35-yard line a year ago so it is a good guess that hes saying that they should go back to the old rule and kick off from the 30.A couple of lines later under rule changes hed like to see, Allen writes, Same as scoring plays, all turnovers should be automatically reviewed. Uh, the NFL passed that change at the league meetings in March.There are a few other interesting viewpoints in there, especially what Allen has to say about his boss. Its certainly worth a read for anyone who follows the Redskins.
The Redskins had a tough, physical game against the Rams last Sunday and it shows on the team’s injury report. Five players are listed as questionable for the coming game against the Raiders at FedEx Field.
TE Jordan Reed (chest), RB Rob Kelley (ribs), ILB Mason Foster (shoulder), S Montae Nicholson (shoulder), and CB Josh Norman (shoulder) are the players who are questionable.
Of those players, Reed was the only one to miss a practice this week. He was out on Wednesday and was back on a limited basis on Thursday and Friday. The Pro Bowl tight end told reporters in the locker room that he will be in the lineup on Sunday.
There is particular concern about Kelley’s injury. He is likely to start as he usually does. But CSN is reporting that the team will have four running backs on the game day active list instead of the three they went with in Weeks 1 and 2. Mack Brown will dress for the Redskins after being inactive in both previous games.
MORE REDSKINS: A STRONG START FOR SMITH BUT MORE IS NEEDED
Thursday night's Rams-49ers game was surprisingly fun. It was also unofficially the Check Out All These Ex-Redskins Now Playing or Working in California Bowl.
Sean McVay and Kyle Shanahan, two former Washington offensive coordinators, are now in charge of the two teams. Old 'Skins like Aldrick Robinson, Derek Carrier and John Sullivan, meanwhile, were a part of the on-field action.
It was Pierre Garçon, though, who pushed Burgundy and Gold fans to take their phones out of their pocket and pen sad tweets. That's because the 31-year-old wideout caught seven Brian Hoyer passes (that's impressive on its own, by the way) for 142 yards vs. Los Angeles on Thursday Night Football.
And while his team lost 41-39, Garçon didn't deserve to with plays like this:
WOW. Pierre Garcon is absolutely BALLIN' tonight. pic.twitter.com/MELHd24W4O— NFLonCBS (@NFLonCBS) September 22, 2017
Even with that standout performance, however, Redskins fans shouldn't be cursing the franchise for letting Garçon go. Not yet, anyway.
This past march, the veteran left D.C. after five seasons to sign with San Fran. His deal was a rich one: five years for $47.5 million ($17 million guaranteed at signing). The Niners can get out of it after two years, but it still is a sizable contract even with that potential exit.
That kind of money is the first thing those who miss Garçon should think about. Now, the Redskins didn't exactly handle their negotiations with him that smoothly, but in the end, unless he gave Washington a nice discount, he just would've cost a lot to keep.
Secondly, it's easy to slam the 'Skins for losing Garçon while Kirk Cousins and Co. have stalled through two games in 2017. But the reason that's happening thus far has more to do with Cousins' inaccuracy in Weeks 1 and 2 and an offensive line that's not at the level it should be than with that familiar No. 88 not lining up outside anymore.
Would Garçon have made a difference for the Redskins against the Eagles and Rams if he were still here? Yeah, probably. But when Jay Gruden's unit starts operating at its normal speed and precision — and it will — the upset voices lamenting Garçon's departure will get quieter.
This is nothing against the guy who was the NFL's 2013 receptions leader and who's well on his way to another productive campaign. It's just that it feels premature to make the connection that allowing him to move on is what's ailing the Washington offense, or that it was a disastrous decision.
Give Garçon's far cheaper replacements (Terrelle Pryor and Josh Doctson) more time. Wait for the quarterback and his linemen to sync up again. In a league with just 16 games, that's very hard to do, but let's see if those in the area long for Garçon in December as much as they are currently longing for him in September.