Quick Links

What if the Nats don't do anything?

rizzodavey_11-7.png

What if the Nats don't do anything?

Already over a month into their offseason, the Nationals haven't given many answers or even signs as to their plan for 2013. Will they re-sign Adam LaRoche? Sign a top free agent?  We're still waiting. 

One theory that has perhaps been overlooked, and what Nats fans may fear, is if the Nationals did nothing at all. That is to say they didn't even sign LaRoche and just rolled with the players they already have under contract. This would mean slotting either Tyler Moore or Michael Morse at first base and looking to their minor league system for re-inforcements. 

While the Nationals' recent history would suggest they will not sit this offseason out, a recent story in The Washington Post says it's possible.

Here is what Nats manager Davey Johnson told columnist Thomas Boswell:

“I’m not pushing for anything. I don’t have a wish list. There’s nothing I think we have to go hog wild about this winter. We’re going to be strong next year. If we don’t do anything, we’ll be fine.

“Our payroll might go down,” he said, half-joking.

Rizzo had this to say about why this year could be different:

“In past winters, we’ve jumped out quickly” with signings, he said. “This time around, we don’t have any pressing needs. We’ll probably see where the landscape is after the winter meetings."

Davey later suggests the Nats are offering a two-year deal to LaRoche and that could be the final sticking point. He also suggests indirectly that the Nationals' offer is $25 million for those two seasons. The 33-year-old first baseman is likely looking at his final shot for a big free agent deal and just finished a career year. 

If LaRoche chooses to leave for a bigger deal somewhere else, the Nationals would have a hard time replacing what he did for them in 2012. Not only was LaRoche their most consistent offensive player, he was also a Gold Glove player on defense. Moore and Morse would both provide adequate defense at first base, but a drop-off would certainly be noticed. Both players are also solid offensive players, but Moore is inexperienced and Morse is injury prone.

LaRoche is also the biggest free agent prize at the first base position this offseason and it's not even close. In order to find a replacement for him outside of the organization it would likely mean a trade. Then they would be selling off some of the depth they are counting on helping them improve next season.

The Nationals have money to spend and could try and improve in a lot of areas this offseason. They could also stand pat and roll with what they already have. It still sounds like they want to sign LaRoche, but as their comments suggest, anything could happen.

Quick Links

Bryce Harper wants Nationals to invest in Matt Wieters, Greg Holland more than facilities

Bryce Harper wants Nationals to invest in Matt Wieters, Greg Holland more than facilities

Bryce Harper isn't one to keep his opinions to himself. The Nationals slugger is outspoken about what he wants, whether that's to "Make Baseball Fun Again" or to make at least $400 million on his next contract

On Wednesday, he gave his take on how the Nats should be investing their money this summer. Here's Harper responding to a tweet from ESPN's Jim Bowden.

Harper's message: Players over everything else. Sorry, gift shop. 

It's plain to see where the 2015 NL MVP is going with this. Obviously, he wants as much talent around him as possible for a chance to win the World Series. 

Matt Wieters, a four-time All-Star catcher, and Greg Holland, a two-time All-Star closer, could be significant additions to Washington's roster. 

Harper is set to become a free agent in 2018, at which point an organization like the New York Yankees will be prepared to offer him both a massive salary and a massive investment in the players around him.

The slugger probably hopes his current team will try to surround him with winning pieces in an effort to keep him. But if a report about the Nationals' reaction to his contract demands proves accurate, they may have another agenda. 

There's Harper drama around the Nationals? Just a regular Wednesday here in Washington.

MORE NATIONALS: Nationals avoid arbitration with Harper, three others

Quick Links

Nationals avoid arbitration, reach deal with Bryce Harper and three others

Nationals avoid arbitration, reach deal with Bryce Harper and three others

The Washington Nationals avoided arbitration and agreed to one-year deals today with Bryce Harper, Anthony Rendon, Tanner Roark and newly acquired catcher Derek Norris.

If team's and players didn't agree to contracts by today's 1 p.m. ET deadline, an independent arbitrator will rule on the contract at a later date and decide how much the player will play for in 2017. 

Harper and the Nationals agreed to a $13.625 million deal, which was significantly more than the $9.3 million contract that was projected by MLB Trade Rumors. Last season, coming off his 2015 MVP campaign, Harper made $5 million. The 24-year-old will be a free agent after the 2018 season. 

Harper is coming off a disappointing season by his standards, in which he hit just .243 with 24 homers, which was way down from his total of 42 dingers in 2015. 

According to multiple reports, Rendon signed for $5.8 million, Roark signed for $4.315 million and Norris' deal was for $4.2 million.

Roark made just $543,400 last season, which he vastly out-performed. Roark was one of the most consistent pitchers in the National League last year as he won 16 games and posted a 2.83 ERA in 210 innings of work. 

With today's signings, all of the Nationals' arbitration-eligible players are under contract for 2017. 

Related: Tanner Roark to replace Max Scherzer on World Baseball Classic roster