Quick Links

Should the Nats look at Wilson?

brianwilson.png

Should the Nats look at Wilson?

The Washington Nationals are moving through the offseason quietly, but they still have a few needs to address. One is the replacement for lefty reliever Sean Burnett if he signs elsewhere, so the Nats are looking for at least one member of their bullpen.

But what if the Nationals choose to be more aggressive and look for insurance at closer? If that is the Nats’ intention, the market for closers and relief pitchers may be starting to dry up. Jonathan Broxton and Ryan Madson have already found deals and even Jeremy Affeldt, who looked like a good substitute for Burnett, was signed.

Still remaining among this year’s best free agents are Mike Adams and Joakim Soria, plus Burnett if the Nats are still interested. But one more possibility has presented itself in recent days. What about Brian Wilson of the San Francisco Giants?

Wilson is expected to be non-tendered by the Giants later this week after making $8.5 million in 2012. The black-bearded closer pitched in just two games this past season after undergoing Tommy John surgery for the second time in his career. He is 30 years old with two elbow scars, but the potential gain could be worth a one-year deal.

Before 2012, Wilson had averaged 41 saves between 2008 and 2011. He was a huge part of the 2010 World Series team with a career-high 48 regular season saves and six in the postseason. Wilson, in fact, has never allowed an earned run in the playoffs across ten appearances. 

For Wilson, it’s all about the elbow as the experience and composure would not be a problem. Entering free agency coming off his second Tommy John surgery, the asking price can’t be very high. 

The Nationals signed Brad Lidge in January to fill a similar role last season, ‘closer B’ if you will. He was brought in for one year, $1 million plus incentives.

Lidge was 35 and coming off of a season of just 25 games because of shoulder problems. The situations are different in some ways, but also similar in that both were former World Series heroes looking to move on to new chapters of their careers. If the price is right, should the Nationals take a look?

Quick Links

Nationals decline to tender the contract of Ben Revere

usatsi_9561611.jpg
USA Today Sports

Nationals decline to tender the contract of Ben Revere

Ben Revere was brought to Washington in the hopes he could solve the centerfield and lead-off issue that plagued them the previous year. After just one year, the Nationals have decided to move on from Revere as they declined to tender him.

The move makes Revere a free agent after a .217/.260/.300 season that fell way below expectations. Revere tied his career-high with two home runs and added 24 RBI while scoring 44 runs. 

Stay tuned for more information!

Quick Links

Nationals trade to re-acquire former catcher prospect Derek Norris

Nationals trade to re-acquire former catcher prospect Derek Norris

Back in December 2011, the Nationals traded catcher prospect Derek Norris to Oakland in the deal that brough Gio Gonzalez to Washington. Almost exactly five years later, the team pulled off a trade to get Norris back, according to multiple reports. 

The trade that shipped away Norris in the first place also included pitcher A.J. Cole, whom the Nationals re-aquired in 2013. 

Norris joins Washington catchers Jose Lobaton and Pedro Severino. The Nats re-signed Lobaton to a one year deal yesterday after deciding not to bring back All-Star catcher Wilson Ramos, who tore his ACL at the end of last season. 

MORE NATIONALS: Washington Nationals Rumors: Andrew McCutchen chatter